Hosmer Pond project emerges as alternative to Camden paying DEP fine
CAMDEN — A new ADA-compliant dock and the rebuilding of a boat launch on Hosmer Pond will resolve up to 80 percent of a state penalty being imposed on Camden for environmental violations. On May 16, the Camden Select Board approved the project and agreed to spend money from two separate municipal accounts — what’s left in the Ragged Mountain Redevelopment bond fund, and the Snow Bowl reserve balance — to cover the cost.
Will Gartley, of the Camden-based firm Gartley and Dorsky, presented plans for the supplemental environmental project to the board at its regularly scheduled meeting. Following a bid process, Interim Town Manager Roberta Smith had recommended the town award the job contract to Farley and Son, of Rockport, for $52,300. The three Select Board members present at the meeting followed her suggestion, voting unanimously in favor of the bid award.
The project is to be completed by July 1, and bring the town one step closer to resolving its state environmental penalty.
In 2014, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection sent a violation notice to Camden, citing sedimentary contamination of Hosmer Brook and Pond that occurred when silt and soil, loosened during tree logging on Ragged Mountain during ski trail construction, ran down the hill and into the water. The trail work was part of the larger Ragged Mountain redevelopment project.
The violation notice (see attached PDF) was issued after the DEP approved the alteration of 7,028 square feet of wet meadow and forested wetlands for the Snow Bowl ski trail expansion project. During the logging, however, trees were skidded down several pre-existing trails, severely disturbing soils without erosion controls.
Since then, Town Attorney Bill Kelly has been negotiating with the DEP over a consent agreement, and a possible project to mitigate the fiscal blow to taxpayers. On behalf of the town, Gartley joined the discussions with the DEP, and the town and state eventually approved the supplemental environmental project.
The estimated DEP fine for the violation is $40,000 to $44,000. The dock/launch project, however, will reduce that by approximately 80 percent.
According to DEP policy, supplemental environmental projects are allowed, but can only apportion 80 percent of the total penalty levied by the state agency; therefore, Camden may be left with a final DEP monetary fine of approximately $6,000.
But by substituting the supplemental environmental project for a monetary fine, the town will benefit by investing in itself, said Gartley, as opposed to directly depositing taxpayer money into state coffers.
Gartley said he had proposed the Hosmer Pond launch improvements after noticing the effects of sand and silt runoff from the poorly built road to the town-maintained boat launch. The runoff had been building up for years, he said, as the road to the launch area is sloped and muddy.
The Hosmer Pond launch road and parking area is used year-round. In the summer, small boats are put in there, and swimmers venture in as well. In the winter, ice shacks are transported onto the frozen pond from the launch area, and ice skaters and ice boaters glide onto the ice from there.
The project will include raising the road grade 2.5 feet, reclaiming wetlands and planting approximately 30 wetlands shrubs there.
Permit applications have been submitted to the DEP, and the project deadline is July 1, he said.
Three weeks ago, the town circulated a request for bids to build the dock and regrade the road. Two local companies, Farley and Son and Jake Barbour Inc., responded. Farley and Son’s bid was $52,300 and Jake Barbour’s, $57,900. The bids were opened May 15 at the town office.
The engineering bill was $6,083.
According to Smith, the low bid for the alternative DEP fine project came in over the estimated construction costs. She said funds were available in two accounts:
1) the balance of the Ragged Mountain Recreation Area Redevelopment bond fund, which has $35,741 in it; and
2) the Snow Bowl Reserve balance, which as of May 16, held $34,905.
The available funds, said Smith, totaled $70,646.
With the Farley bid of $52,300, the available remaining funds will be $18,046, which will cover the engineering bill, “as well as any residual fine levied by the DEP.”
At the May 16 meeting, the Select Board agreed to the project and acknowledged that the town still had to contend with a DEP consent agreement, albeit with a smaller monetary fine.
The town will hold a special public meeting to discuss that consent agreement, which should be made public soon.
Finalizing the consent agreement will bring the town incrementally closer to closure over the larger Redevelopment project mismanagement. As of two weeks ago, the town had still on its books more than $300,000 in total project cost overruns, which will remain there until the Ragged Mountain Recreation Area Foundation reimburses the town for project costs. The nonprofit Foundation has said it will pay the town the $300,000-plus after it sees a full accounting of all the project expenditures.
The supplemental environmental project cost of approximately $58,000 adds to the overall project cost.
Related stories:
• Camden considers new project to mitigate 2014 Hosmer Pond contamination (May 15, 2017)
• Ragged Mountain Foundation pays half of Camden's $743,134 Snow Bowl shortfall
• Camden waits for $743,143 reimbursement for Ragged Mountain redevelopment
• Camden Snow Bowl forensic audit report delayed, again (March 17, 2017)
• Camden's Snow Bowl audit results delayed, no decision on DEP consent agreement, yet
• Camden and the Snow Bowl redevelopment: One citizen's inquiry into the cash flow (Feb. 2, 2017)
• Camden Snow Bowl Manager resigns; Camden commences new town manager search (Jan. 27, 2017)
• Camden Town Manager resigns (Jan. 18, 2017)• Tacos, fat bikes and demo skis at the Camden Snow Bowl this weekend
• Camden orders Snow Bowl financial audit; to negotiate with Sidecountry, Cold Toes Tacos
• Following public outcry, Camden Select Board moved to help put two entrepreneurs back at Snow Bowl (Jan. 11, 2017)
• Camden, Rockland entrepreneurs told not to set up shop at Snow Bowl this weekend (Jan. 7, 2017)
• Camden Select Board pledges oversight of Snow Bowl spending, approves $920,000 budget (Aug. 4, 2016)
• Shaping the Camden Snow Bowl budget: Spend more to make more, or rein it in? (August 4 2016)
• Camden voters approve dipping into surplus to cover Snow Bowl's $297,303 deficit
• Camden Select Board forms new Ragged Mountain committee to advise the Snow Bowl (June 7, 2016)
• Camden Select Board chastises itself for Snow Bowl deficit, forms new committees to help
• Camden leaders make plan to reduce Snow Bowl's two-year deficit
• What to do about the Camden Snow Bowl’s $260,000 deficit
• Sales, revenue up for season ski passes up at Camden Snow Bowl
• Camden readies Snow Bowl for new season; ticket, season pass price increases included (July 20, 2015)
• Camden approves Ledgewood contract for phase 2 of mountain work (May 20, 2015)
• With record snowfall, Camden's Ragged Mountain Recreation Area begins making financial headway
• Camden Snow Bowl Redevelopment Committee, Ragged Mountain Foundation hold community meeting (March 2, 2015)
• Camden Snow Bowl project up to $8.4 million, fundraising resumes (Feb. 3, 2015)
• Making tracks in some dreamy snow at Camden Snow Bowl (Jan. 30)
• Snow Bowl to fire up chairlifts; refunds offered to passholders (Jan 21)
• Camden Planning Board to begin Snow Bowl lodge review (Jan. 9)
Camden Select Board brings in old friend to help with Snow Bowl progress (Jan. 7)
• Camden Snow Bowl to start making snow Jan. 5 (Jan. 2)
• Snow Bowl progress report to Camden Select Board continues to be positive (Dec. 3)
• One by one, 20 chairlift towers went up at the Camden Snow Bowl (Dec. 1)
• Helicopter to help raise, place 23 chairlift towers at Camden Snow Bowl (Dec. 1)
• Report: Ragged Mountain Redevelopment Project $500,000 over budget (Oct. 8)
• Camden Planning Board approves Snow Bowl lighting plan as proposed (Oct. 6)
• Camden Snow Bowl on target for Dec. 20 opening, weather willing (Sept. 19)
• Camden to contract with South Portland firm to manage Snow Bowl lodge, base area (July 24, 2014)
• Camden Snow Bowl project remains under DEP scrutiny, making progress, more work ahead (July 11)
• Vermont trail builder takes helm with Camden Snow Bowl project, new phase gets under way (July 10)
Camden Snow Bowl prepped for more rain, assembling working group to assist with next steps (July 2)
• Snow Bowl mountain mud runoff causes headache for neighbors, town (July 1)
• Camden Snow Bowl anticipates ending season in the black; work begins on Ragged Mountain (March 19)
• Homage to Camden’s Big T (March 15, 2014)
• By wide margin, Camden voters approve Snow Bowl improvement bond (Nov. 5, 2013)
• Camden voters consider $2 million Snow Bowl bond, three zoning amendments (Nov. 3, 2013)
• Camden committee selects new parks and recreation director (Sept. 6, 2013)
• Camden considers $2 million Snow Bowl bond, ordinance amendments Nov. 5 (Sept. 4, 2014)
• Camden ready to put $2 million bond before voters (Aug. 21, 2013)
• Camden pursues federal money to help with Snow Bowl upgrade (July 10, 2013)
• Camden learns about refurbished chairlifts, woven grips and haul ropes (April 10, 2013)
• Last run for Jeff (Jan. 21, 2013)
• Stellar start to season at Camden Snow Bowl (Jan. 9, 2013)
• Camden’s Ragged Mountain loses a good friend (Nov. 7, 2012)
• Ready for packed powder? Camden Snow Bowl to make it quicker, sooner with updated snow guns (Sept. 12, 2012)
Reach Editorial Director Lynda Clancy at lyndaclancy@penbaypilot.com; 207-706-6657
Event Date
Address
United States